Comments on: Paul Quinn on Hal Neilson arraignment and whistleblower allegations

By: Robert

Robert — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 03:53:10 +0000

somslawer, I can understand your confusion. I guess most cases never reach the level had regarding our own case. The type of persons involved as well corporations moving through the court and your states government at will. Rewriting history to a claimed major event. And although I spew, as you say. Please note that, yes I’ve brought attention to the matter however other than injuries and loss. That isn’t my name signed to the court documents of settled awards. Failed trials, punitive awards of unannounced who dat compensatory damage,etc. My point is. What occurred could have happen to anyone. Excluding that fact. Our name does appear as victims per awards and settlements but nothing more regarding any redress. Many involved with settlements in this have moved on to greater more expensive things in life. Overseeing the lower courts. Notice the S, local government etc. I guess it’s all sweet being on the other side the fence. What’s the deal? How could such a thing help anyone having been the target of such an act. This is your Government. The only deal here is a major settlement of my family in a claimed court of law. Extortion of awards by officials of the court. The injuries and real property loss used to settle. All of it documented. The dismissed bill of rights and that old unused constitution. Now just what exactly is untrue?

I guess in short if the courts were honest I wouldn’t be writing this.
Regarding other courts being any better to a given condition or situation you should get out more often.

By: Charlie Ali

Charlie Ali — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 04:07:23 +0000

Neilson got $50k from the Grisanti, Covington, et al partnership. The indictment said he used the money 2 pay off credit card debt. Next question is what did the payers get from Neilson? Payola usually has a purpose.

By: Hatfield

Hatfield — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 01:24:45 +0000

ampal, Neilson did profit from this correct? The law was broken and to me it doesn’t really matter who turned him in…… The I was framed crap just doesn’t fly with me.

By: Ben

Ben — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:33:53 +0000

The contractor you’re inquiring about was an unsuccessful competitor for the FBI bldg. Shouldn’t be too hard to figger out.

By: ampal

ampal — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 23:41:48 +0000

hatfield, if neilson hoped nobody would find out, how’d that contractor find out? rove, i think your post raises some good questions, but how’d anyone know if neilson was framed? maybe neilson’s just a wise fool like ed peters.

By: Observer

Observer — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:49:54 +0000

Hatfield’s comment tangentially touches upon something that I see as a growing problem, and that is the “us” versus “them” mentality among federal agencies, and especially in federal law enforcement. Federal buildings are now fenced in and heavily guarded and have become “Ft. Apache.” Talk to local cops and they will tell you they don’t trust the feds at all. Fed are buddy-buddy with the locals until some doper alleges he was Tasered for no reason and then the local cop is in for the hassle of his life. Hatfield hits the nail on the head: if Neilson, in his capacity as an FBI agent, had uncovered activities similar to his own committed by some public official other than him, Neilson would have no hesitation to arrest, charge, and prosecute.

By: somslawyer

somslawyer — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:49:48 +0000

Robert, my comment was based on the incoherence of your comment. Yes, I am a south Mississippi lawyer and I know that most of what you spew is untrue based on more than 30 years’ experience with these courts as both plaintiff and defense lawyer. I appreciate that you feel ill-used in your own case, but that is not an evidentiary base for assessment of other courts in other cases.

By: Hatfield

Hatfield — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:32:33 +0000

Mr Neilson knew exactly what he was doing and knew that it was against the law. He hoped nobody would find out about his ownership in the deal. This is the type of crime he would investigate if an elected official had done the same thing. Mr. Neilson better get ready to spend his days in jail.

By: Robert

Robert — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:40:05 +0000

I’m talking dirt on the states legal issues and mention how some of the Southren counties, IMO are most likely up to their eyeballs in ungodly corrupotion and then. I fail to see how taking my meds helps the states needed enema. somslawyer, that would be South MS.lawyer wouldn’t it. Ya! I bet you get your ears filled on a daliy basis.

By: Charlie Ali

Charlie Ali — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:43:31 +0000

Why would a contractor ‘tip off’ the deal to Greenlee when the partnerships r public record? I found C&G Properties, Jam Entertainment, ACM Properties, Osprey Management, Triple G., Oxford Dependable Dry Storage, etc. on the Secretary of States website…Greenlee said his office thought it was an ethical situation which was referred to FBI hdqs, I believe. When I think of the Beef plant I think of a deep conspiracy that is also a highly political, bungled investigation. National security, black ops and drugs r perhaps a stretch, but the Congress or a Commission would co-op that if it becomes part of the story.