I am Tom Freeland, a lawyer in Oxford, Mississippi. The picture in the header is my law office. I'm on Twitter as NMissC

Missing Posts: If you have a link to a post that's not here or are looking for posts from Summer of 2010, check this page.

BlogRoll

More Minor: Most interesting unexplained sentence in Jerry Mitchell’s story

This sentence caught my eye:

Contacted for comment, U.S. Attorney Don Burkhalter said his office has been recused from the case and he couldn’t comment.

As I understood it, Dunn Lampton recused himself from the case, but the S.D. Miss. office continued to prosecute.  When did the whole office get recused? Why? Is something occurring offstage about that office that we haven’t heard about?  Jerry, or someone, ask for an explanation! We’re curious!

Print Friendly

10 comments to More Minor: Most interesting unexplained sentence in Jerry Mitchell’s story

  • bellesouth

    Maybe because there is no more federal jurisdiction?

  • NoMiss

    So Belle, if there’s no federal jurisdiction, does that mean that your best buddy Attorney General Jim Hood will take up the case?

  • bellesouth

    I don’t know NoMiss. I was just speculating on NMC’s question, but I would say that after 3 trials, I would say the case is res judicata.

  • Robert

    Recuse, like it would be my job but!!!.. If its jurisidiction it wouldn’t be a reclusal huh? As far as it being an issue with Hood. Theres the self imposed code of Federal Friendship and Jurisdictional Family statute. From the AG’s handbook. Making justice chase its tail. Under the chapter on profits. It shows cow milking and how using cracks in the fence [of justice] allows for greater returns. Its right next to the Chapter ” Let’em eat fake “

  • bodean

    Does this happen often?

  • NMC

    bellesouth, you’re a laugh riot. What’s res judicata at this point is that Minor, Teel and Witfield committed mail fraud.

    bodean: I don’t think it’s very common for entire offices of US Attorneys to be recused but I don’t know for sure.

  • Robert

    Maybe it depends on the next D.O.J. awards to be presented. If such is the case, is it recuse or like of honest services?
    If Hood won’t act and the D.O.J. has reclused. Then what? The D.o.j. should release a list of all cases in where this has occurred in this state. Might remove the wondering about a lot of things. With the hoildays around the corner the family and friends list should be easy to submit.

  • stephanie

    state ag cannot proseucte- the st of limitations has run on the Minor case

  • meanderline

    Figures. There’s no statute of limitations on a false pretense charge for writing a bad check. Guess the legislature felt that’s more important than judicial bribery.

  • bellesouth

    bellesouth, you’re a laugh riot. What’s res judicata at this point is that Minor, Teel and Witfield committed mail fraud.

    Yep, you better be sure you want to lick that stamp or hit the enter key on your transaction on your next judicial campaign contribution.

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>