Missing posts

Posts between early March and late July of 2010 are for the moment missing-- when we moved from one host to another, the prior host arbitrarily witheld 5 months of posts and is demanding we both move back and pay them to get back our data. While I try to solve this, you can find these posts by searching Google and clicking the "cached" option.
I am Tom Freeland, a lawyer in Oxford, Mississippi. The picture in the header is my law office. I'm on Twitter as NMissC
I started (co)blogging as NMC in early 2008 on the Folo blog, (with coblogger Lotus); that blog went on hiatus in March, 2009. In 2005, I covered Fifth Circuit cases for the (now defunct) Appellate Law and Practice blog.

Blogroll

NY Times discusses impact of Skilling on honest services cases, mentions Zach Scruggs’s motion

The New York Times looks around the country surveying the impact of the Sklling case on honest services cases that don’t involve straight up bribery.  The case starts with a newly sworn-in U.S. Attorney’s dismissal of charges in a Kansas case:

On Friday afternoon, a federal judge swore in Barry R. Grissom as the United States attorney [...]

A Puzzlement about Bar Discipline Procedures

This is genuinely a question, and not intended to hint darkly at anything.  The question is based on Zach Scruggs’s motion to set aside his guilty plea, which includes as exhibits affidavits that Tony Farese filed in response to a bar complaint Zach Scruggs filed against Tony Farese.

The question:  Do complaining witnesses have access to the [...]

Joey Langston and the prosecutors describe how Joey came to plea

By far the most interesting reading in the exhibits filed with Zach Scruggs’s motion, at least from the standpoint of news, are three exhibits that are affidavits filed in the state bar proceeding in which Zach Scruggs filed a bar complaint against Tony Farese.

Recall that Zach hired Tony at the time of his arraignment for the [...]

Zach Scruggs has produced a lot of news

There’s a lot of news in the motion Zach Scruggs filed. The most interesting is surfacing because Zach has filed a bar complaint against Tony Farese. In his response, Farese filed affidavits of prosecutors David Sanders (now a Magistrate Judge) and Bob Norman, along with an affidavit of Joey Langston. The purpose of [...]

Wilkie on Hood, Scruggs, and the State Farm negotiations

Bill Minor has a column based on having seen the galleys of Curtis Wilkie’s book about Scruggs, and has enough news in it to suggest the book is going to be very interesting.  What Minor is writing about is the moment when Scruggs was working toward a settlement with State Farm, and Jim Hood was not [...]

Zach Scruggs is asking to set aside his guilty plea

Patsy Brumfield, who has apparently seen a pleading not yet visible on Pacer, reports that Zach Scruggs is about to file to set aside his guilty plea, taking a potshot a his first laywer, Tony Farese, and arguing that legal developments– presumably the Minor case in the Fifth Circuit (which held that there had to be [...]

Judge Hitner in Wilson v. Scruggs: Lets get on with it– and do so in 14 pt type

What remains of Wilson v. Scruggs is in the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi.  As I’ve posted earlier, Wilson has settled with Scruggs and Langston but continues to pursue Patterson, Peters, and Balducci (the last filed a pleading admitting liability but asserting other defendants were primarily liable).  The case is before Judge [...]

Trial Court Rules for Hood / Langston against Pickering in MCI Fee Case

A quick read of the opinion granting summary judgment for Hood shows that the basis is that Hood had the authority to hire outside counsel and that, because MCI paid the money, there’s not a legal issue about the legislature appropriating. From Sid Salter’s blog:

http://www.clarionledger.com/assets/pdf/D0152201219.PDF

Hinds County Circuit Judge Winston Kidd has ruled against State Auditor [...]

Two minor Scruggs tidbits

Two stories that might be of interest to folks following the Scruggs case.  First, Patsy Brumfield writes about the resolution of the case involving Ed Peters’s “fee.”

The second is a tad more obscure, and I’ll present it in the form of a Scruggs trivia question:  The discrimination claims of Black farmers against the Agriculture Department is [...]

Scruggs news: US v. $425K (the Peters fee case) resolved with $280K paid to Roberts Wilson

Recall that the first substantial public evidence that Ed Peters had “come in” and become to some degree a government witness was a forfeiture action filed between Christmas and New Years in 2008, in which the Government alleged that he had surrendered to them $425,000 that remained of his million dollar fee for helping Joey Langston [...]